Sunday, 27 December 2015

Facebook is misleading Indians with its full-page ads about Free Basics

Written by, Mahesh Murty.
[Mahesh Murthy is an Indian venture capitalist. This article originally appeared on LinkedIn and is republished here with the author’s permission]

Sign the petition here:

Today facebook has ads around India saying "What net neutrality activists won't tell you".

I'm a net neutrality activist and I'm happy to tell you anything you'd like to know. In fact, we're a small group, working unpaid, taking breaks from our regular jobs, and we've always been happy to tell you anything at all you wanted to know.

We don't have a business axe to grind, we're not working for Facebook's rivals, and if anything, we've been part of Digital India far, far longer than Facebook has existed. We're open to questioning.

Unlike Facebook, who tried to silently slime this thing through last year when it was called, and then are spending about Rs. 100 crores on ads - a third of its India revenue? - to try and con us Indians this year again. This is  after we'd worked hard to ban these kind of products, technically called "zero rating apps" last year. (Remember the million signature campaign last year? That was us.)

This Facebook ad spend doesn't include the full-on Mark Zuckerberg love event put up for our Prime Minister when he visited the US, aimed again at greasing the way for this Free Basics thing through our government. (It worked. I think TRAI opened up this closed issue so Facebook could get another shot at pushing it through again.)

And the ad spend is above and beyond all the other ads and messages they've put on your timeline asking you to save "the free internet" etcetera that you may have even clicked on.

I'll take on each of the 10 points that Facebook says that we don't tell you about in a bit. But first you should know why we're making a fuss and going up against this billion dollar giant. What's it all about?

Simply it's this. Our airwaves and wireless spectrum belong to us, the citizens of India. The government of India temporary licenses this on our behalf to telcos under some terms and conditions, and those terms have always pushed for the development of all of India, including our poor.

In fact, India's telecom policies so far have produced a minor miracle, with over a billion connections in our country changing and improving all our lives. The basis for this has always our policies which have forced our mobile operators to offer a full and open internet, accessible by anybody. Many poorer countries look to us for inspiration on how to do things right.

It is because of these policies that you probably are reading this on the mobile internet, maybe even on Facebook on your phone. But Facebook has been spending millions of dollars to change our policies.

Imagine now that there's a new policy that could let a mobile company only offer you Facebook and nothing else on government spectrum? Not Google, not Naukri, not You Tube, no site you really need. But instead all you can have is Facebook, and a bunch of other teeny tiny sites, and that's all you can ever use.

That's what Facebook wants to offer the poor of India who can afford a phone but not a net connection on it. Given that data packages cost as little as Rs. 20 a month while phones cost Rs. 2,000 and up, we think their thesis itself is flawed, and they're using it to justify a large internet user land grab, but let's roll with it for a moment.

What Facebook wants is our less fortunate brothers and sisters should be able to poke each other and play Candy Crush, but not be able to look up a fact on Google, or learn something on Khan Academy or sell their produce on a commodity market or even search for a job on Naukri.

An analogy is this: people need a balanced diet of proteins, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals and the government has a distribution system called Sahakari Bhandars to get these to us. Facebook wants to use our government system to sell only its branded cocaine and nothing else, on special shops, to people who can't access any other shop. Something like that.

In their ads, they've been claiming they want to bring "digital equality" when they're actually bringing digital slavery or digital apartheid to our poor. Unlike the rest of us who are all digitally equal, being able to access the full and complete internet which has more than a billion sites on it, Facebook wants to offer our poor, our young and our future a few dozen sites, that's all. was their earlier attempt at doing this. We'd pointed out even the name was a lie, as it was neither the internet that was offered, nor was it done on a non-profit basis that dot orgs typically use. So they've changed the name to Free Basics and have come back to try shove it down our throats again. Same poison, new bottle but with big ad campaign.

Here's the gist of the tussle. What we're telling our government is this: On our airwaves, make sure that every mobile carrier in India offers every person in India the full internet and not just some small corner of it chosen by Facebook. That's it. No special Facebook landgrab on government property, our wireless spectrum.

What Facebook is saying is this: allow the mobile companies using government-owned bandwidth to offer just Facebook and Facebook-chosen sites and nothing else, and let them grab the land or users they want.

Facebook says it is doing this out of some charitable aim to get more of India online. (As though spending a large portion of your India revenues on full page ads pushing a so-called charity is apparently charity.) Its obviously business.

We've responded saying "We love your idea of data for charity, but if you really mean to do charity then offer something that is the entire internet to people, not just your chosen sites. Like say 500mb a month free to every Indian". They can, but no, they won't do that. They want use our government's bandwidth to get our poor using Facebook with no other real option in sight.

Now to counter the "10 clarifications about Facebook Free Basics" that we 'activists' have apparently hidden from you.

1. "Free Basics is open to any carrier." Sure it is. We never said it wasn't. Irrelevant point.

2. "We don't charge anyone for Free Basics." Sure we all know that. We never said they charged. Even more irrelevant.

3. "We don't pay for the data consumed in Free Basics." We don't say they do. Misleading again. They don't pay operators for the data to get free sign ups for Facebook - but they spend a huge sum of money (seen those Reliance Free Net ads?) on marketing that drives customers to these operators. Either way there's a gain for the operator. Why pay in cash when you can pay in ads?

4. "Any developer can have their content on Free Basics." Who said they can't? But the big sites don't. They don't want Facebook to own their customers, and they don't want Facebook to snoop on their customer data, because all traffic goes via Facebook servers.

Data is cheap enough in India and eventually everybody will be on the full and open internet, given time. Or our government could offer a neutral and free internet service to its citizens. There are other solutions to getting the poor online. Selling our people to Facebook doesn't need to be one.

5. "Nearly 800 developers have signed their support for Free Basics." We never said they didn't. Many, many more haven't. Still irrelevant.

6. "It is not a walled garden. 40% of our users go on to access the full internet within 30 days." Which means 60% of their users are stuck in Facebook jail. Why should even one Indian citizen be? The internet should be open for all our people, or the net should be neutral as we say, especially on public property, which the wireless spectrum is.

7. "Free Basics is growing and popular in 36 countries, which have welcomed the program with open arms and seen enormous benefits." This is a lie. This scam may have been pushed through in these poor, mostly helpless African nations who have no experience of anything better, like we have, and who have no 'activists' like us who tell their governments they're raising a generation of deprived children with no access to the real internet.

More to the point, this program, call it digital apartheid, if you will, has been roundly condemned by experts ranging from Tim Berners-Lee, the gent who invented the internet, to Ph D researchers to civil society officials working in the field, globally.

The fact that Tanzania didn't know how to say no to Facebook doesn't mean India has to say yes. In fact, we hope that India saying no to this digital apartheid will inspire the African and other poor nations to kick out this evil program that serves no one but Facebook at their government's expense.

8. "In a recent representative poll, 86% of Indians supported Free Basics." Guess what, if you've ever clicked "yes" on any misleading poll by Facebook apparently asking you to support "connecting India" or "free internet", then you too apparently voted for them. They never brought you both sides of the story, to take a fair decision.

9. "3.2 million people have petitioned TRAI in support of Free Basics." Let's again say it for what it is: 3.2 million people out of Facebook's base of 130 million people who were repeatedly shown a misleading petition by Facebook on top of their pages clicked yes and submit, without being told both sides of the story, and thinking they were doing something for a noble cause, and not to further Facebook's business strategy. A large number of them, shocked at realizing what they were conned into doing have since said no.

10. "There are no ads in the version of Facebook on Free Basics. Facebook produces no revenue. We are doing this to connect India and the benefits to do so are clear." First the unintentional lie. Facebook DOES produce revenue, about Rs. 12,000 crores worth globally. Then the intentional half-truth: It may not produce revenues from this Free Basics YET because the current version of Facebook on it has no ads YET.

If they've spent a hundred crores rupees and a large chunk of their current Indian revenues kissing up to our politicians and telling our citizens they want to do charity, then there absolutely WILL be a monetary payoff. If a product is free then the user is the item being sold

11. Let's add a point here, and actually get to why Facebook is doing this. Forget their lies about "wanting to connect India" - if they really did, they would offer the open and full internet to everybody free. They can, easily, but they have repeatedly have declined to do so, saying first the poor person has to sign up for Facebook and then a few scraggly sites are also shown to them.

The real reason is something they have never denied: their rivalry with Google and their questionable stock price. We are no apologists for Google, but this might interest you:

Both companies have 1.5 billion users, but Google makes Rs. 70,000 crores while Facebook does less than one-fifth as well. In other words, for every new user that comes on the internet, Facebook makes Rs. 8, while Google makes aroumd Rs. 48.

Facebook's stock is valued at a much higher multiple than Google, but people have begin to ask why they deserve this. With no reason to support the stratospheric price, it will fall.

For Facebook to have a chance to keep their stock price high, and to keep Zuckerberg and wife as rich as they are, they need to find new users who sign up for Facebook, but at the same time do not use Google.Enter the strategy: A program to offer Facebook but not Google at the mass, poor people level.

Who is outside the first 1.5 billion people? Mostly people in India and China. Facebook is banned in China. So who becomes essential to Mark Zuckerberg's balance sheet? Enter us Indians. What's a hundred crores of ad spend, against tens of thousands crores of valuation?

Now you have a second view of what's happening. A view they have never denied.

By the way, there's no NGO subsidiary or separate CSR effort at Facebook that runs Free Basics. It's part of their main business unit.

So let's sum it up.

Yes, we net neutrality activists are opposed to Facebook's attempt to disconnect Indians from the full internet. Yes, we are opposed to the digital apartheid they want to bring about, giving the poor only Facebook but denying them other sites.

And yes, we'll be happy if they just gave data free, without terms and conditions - after all, it's our wireless network they want to offer their service on. It has to work for us the people of India, not just for the rich shareholders at Facebook.

There are many other reasons why Facebook Free Basics Digital Apartheid is bad. Its bad for entrepreneurs - your business cant be discovered by these new potential users on the internet till you advertise on Facebook. The same goes for big businesses.

Also, if Facebook is allowed to get away with this then every other company will offer its own "free Basics" with other sites and we will grow up as a fractured country, unable to speak with each other because we are all on different, unconnected micro-networks.

The internet has been the biggest revolution of our times. The breadth and width allowed a Zuckerberg to become the businessman he is. Tragic that he is pushing for a micro network outside the internet where a future Zuckerberg can never realised his potential. It's imperialism and the East India Company all over again. Under the lie of "Digital equality".

We are happy to support any effort that brings the full and unfettered internet to as many Indians as possible, as cheaply as possible. This is not that effort.

We have a petition at

We don't have a hundred crores to spend.

All we ask is that you consider this view, decide for yourself what's best for our country, and see if you are inclined to agree with us.

If you are, please sign the petition above, and share this with as many people as possible.

Your sharing can overcome any billionaire's ad budget.

Thank you.

Also refer:
IIT, IISc faculty members call Facebook's Free Basics a 'lethal combination,' highlight major flaws

Saturday, 14 November 2015

Gurudongmar Lake: Paradise@18000ft

Gurudongmar Lake at almost 18000ft. is one of the highest lakes in the World, placed by nature, in the beautiful Himalayas of northern Sikkim, India, serving as one of the sources for the roaring River Teesta, is one place you 'must' feast your eyes upon.
Having got the chance to visit the Lake recently, I definitely find myself lucky. Yes, even the locals there consider, that good luck needs to be on your side, to visit the Lake, considering its very high altitude, thats about 11000ft. less than The Mount Everest !

The Gurudongmar  Lake

Visiting the same, demands a long road trip, but if you got some cool friends along, which I did have, would only make your trip as amazing as the destination.
Starting off from Gangtok, the capital city of Sikkim, you need to make an ascent to reach a township called 'Lachen', that is at about 9000ft. It is highly recommended that you spend some hours or perhaps a night there, to adjust your body to the change in levels of oxygen and atmospheric pressure.
After the brief break at Lachen, starts your further ascent of another 9000ft. 
But, it needs to start as early as 4 a.m.,
since you need to visit the Lake and return by 11 a.m. as the Indian Army does not permit anyone beyond this time.
On your way, you would find some amazing scenic beauty of the rich Himalayas, which would only put you in an awe.

On the way to the Lake

 At 15000ft., you are stopped at an Indian Army camp, for passenger verifications. There, you meet some very humble men of the Indian Army. There you can get your oxygen levels checked, they give all tips you would require at the height, and also stop people from further ascent who could be at risk. Also, you can have some super-delicious samosas, momos at 'Cafe 15000ft.' of the Indian Army.
Now, with the final 2800ft. of ascent, will start, what I would call 'Paradise', without any exaggeration. The scenic beauty would only make your jaws drop.

On the way to the Lake

The temperature there at -5˙C, wouldn't bother you anymore.
Nature, at its best would be right there for you. With the cold deserts, snow covered mountains, some rare animals, its an absolute delight for nature lovers. With every incredible view, you would feel a cheer inside. You know you have reached your destination when you spot a Gurudwara, which is again the highest on the planet.
The first view of the Gurudongmar Lake, would only double your cheer, guaranteed !
Its awesomeness cannot be contained in words. But, with its pure, peaceful, perfect blue water, you only feel the serenity around. Perfectly silent, with its incredible beauty making all the noise.

P.S. The visit was during the mid of  November. Other months, with varying seasons, have their own version of its incredible beauty. A 'must' place to visit, especially for you, since you read this till the end :-) .

Read More :

Friday, 30 October 2015


The application is aimed at creating a smart delivery system using the already available resources within the city. For e.g. a package would be delivered from point A to point B , using resources like the shared taxis,autos or any local transport mode, which would be available in the desired delivery route.
This system would generate extra revenue for the people who are into transport business. Also the people can avail the intercity delivery facilities for a cheaper price.

Currently, we are also trying to address the routing problem faced by logistic sectors. 

Sunday, 12 July 2015

Hate Removing USB Drives Safely ?

" Life may be just too short to remove USB drives safely  :-) "

And the annoying seconds required to wait for it to eject, may not please the impatient. 
I too stand guilty of ripping apart my drive from the system.

But why does your system want you to wait before it releases your drive.?

A small concept of  'write caching' comes in here :

Rachel Z. Arndt explains what that means over at Popular Mechanics:

"For efficiency's sake, they don't actually write the files
you're moving to the disk until there are multiple files to
move. Ejecting the disk is a way of telling the computer
that it's time to do the writing, regardless of whether the
computer deems it efficient. When you remove a flash
drive without warning the computer first, it might not have
finished writing to the drive."

This means that pulling your external drive out without warning could result in the file you just saved being lost forever - even if you saved it hours ago.

So simply we do this to ensure that the OS isn't busy reading from or writing to the drive when you remove it, something that could result in corrupt data or even a damaged drive. As it turns out, however, you can safely sidestep Safely Remove Hardware with little to no loss of performance. In fact, this option may already be enabled on your system, and you just didn't know it. 
Yup, you may have been wasting extra clicks all this time.

Check this out on your Windows: 
1. Plug your USB drive into your PC, then open Device Manager through your Control Panel.  (FIG.1)
 (Note: These steps are based on Windows 7. Things might look a bit different on other versions of Windows.)

2. Expand Disk Drives, then find the entry for your removable drive. On my system, for example, it's called "SanDisk Cruzer USB Device" (FIG.2)
3. Right-click that entry, then click Properties.     (FIG.2)
4. Click the Policies tab; you should see something like this: (FIG.2)

5. The first option Quick removal must be selected.. As noted in its description, "you CAN disconnect the device safely without using the Safely Remove Hardware notification icon." 
If Better performance is selected, switch to Quick removal and click OK.

So, what are we giving up by disabling write caching? According to the test results found, almost nothing. The performance impact seemed negligible. Your mileage may vary, of course, but I think it's worth it to allow us, to avoid the hassles of having to mess with Safely Remove Hardware all the time.


And now,  In case the "better performance" option on the policies tab, was what that impressed you,  then read on, else the above way was all you wanted..
So, after you select and OK the "better performance" option now, 
I suggest you Get a Shortcut.
Yeah, this might just save you some of your time and might as well be less annoying.
Easier than trying to click the tiny icon in the tray, at least…
Here you see how:
1). Right click on the desktop and Go to 
new -> shortcut  (FIG. 3)
2). In Create shortcut window, Type 
RunDll32.exe shell32.dll,Control_RunDLL hotplug.dll  
(FIG. 3)


3). Click Next

4). Assign a pretty name to your shortcut and Finish..

5). Done.

Now you can use this shortcut to remove USB drives or you can also assign a 'shortcut key' to it.
For assigning a shortcut key :
1). Right click on the shortcut icon.
2). Select properties.
3). In the properties window, click on shortcut tab .
4). Assign a shortcut key to it. Ctrl+Alt is by default. You just need to add an extra key to it.  For e.g. if you press R , then Ctrl+Alt+R, becomes your new short key for Removing your drive.


5) You can also customize your icon, through the "Change Icon.." button and assign an icon of your choice. FIG.4 shows the shortcut icon generated, here I called it "ejectSafe".

6). Now Click on Apply -->  OK.

Thats it, you are good to go...

Sunday, 18 January 2015

Benefits of growing a beard


Many men grow beards because they like the way they look or
because it makes them feel rugged. Plus, there is no denying
the fact that it saves a lot of your morning-routine time!
Most of the popular style icons like Ben Affleck and
George Clooney have started growing one too. Be it to
impress the ladies or to make a fashion statement, a beard
does draw attention. However, did you know that growing
a beard has actual health benefits as well? Researchers
have suggested that growing beards have some absolutely
unbelievable health benefits — including preventing skin
So, here are a few reasons to forget your razor for a while
and why you shouldn't wait until November every year to
officially grow a beard.
Beards protect our Facial skin from harmful Ultraviolet
rays: While most of our body is covered by clothes that
protect our skin from the harmful UV rays of sun, our face
is more vulnerable, as it is exposed. Chances are really
high that when facial skin is constantly exposed to UV
rays, one can develop skin rashes or even skin cancer. A
beard covers most of your lower face and neck perfectly,
thereby protecting the skin.
Reduces allergies & infections: Your beard and moustache
works as a filter that helps to keep allergens from entering
your nose and mouth, thereby reducing chance of allergies
and skin infections. Be sure to treat your beard right and
ensure you wash it regularly.
Beards make the skin look smooth and younger:
Blemishes and cuts are common among who shave on a
daily basis, leading to roughness of the sensitive facial
skin. While growing beard can automatically help you be
blemish-free. What's more? No more cuts either! Though
having a beard can make one look significantly older, the
skin still remains young!

Natural Moisturizer: For a person who regularly shaves,
seasonal changes like heat and cold cause dryness to the
skin. Additionally, heavy use of cosmetic products that
claim to keep the moisture intact, can have an adverse
effect on the skin. Your face has its own built-in
moisturizing regimen (sebaceous glands) which secretes a
natural oil that keeps skin moisturized.

These glands tend
to get eroded due to constant use of a razor. Growing a
beard can help these glands function naturally and keep
your skin smooth and young.

Prevents illnesses: Believe it or not, having a beard can
help you keep illnesses caused by sudden climatic
changes (like a cold or cough) at bay. Your beard often
can serve as an insulation against outside temperature,
trapping your body heat from escaping and keeping your
face and neck warm. This is especially recommended for
those who are constantly on the move.

— Contributed by Abhishek Suresh
Source: The Times Of India